O.J. Simpson has been proved innocent of those murders many times over.

1. After the divorce Nicole Brown got in touch with Faye Resnick who moved in a very shady circle of people doing and dealing drugs, pimping etc. Her friends, her mother and Mr. Simpson thought these were horrible people and she should break up with them, all the more so when Brett Cantor, one of the people in that crowd, was brutally murdered with a knife, but she didn't. After the murder of Cantor Resnick disappeared. The only explanation I can think of is that she knew who did it and was afraid that he would go after her for that reason. After a while she reappeared again, probably having decided that the coast was clear, that the guy had gone.

   The next year Nicole was killed in the exact same way, with the same knife. Resnick disappeared again. How anyone can think it is possible that there is no connection is a mystery to me. Another mystery is how people can make up the most dramatic motives for the murder of Ronald Goldman. It was a last minute appointment, nobody knew he would be there, so how could that murder have been premeditated? That must have been a matter of being at the wrong place at the wrong time; he was killed as a witness. That explains the difference between the two murders.

   It is probably a very simple story, like this one: Faye Resnick and Nicole Brown are at a party. The killer appears there too and starts a conversation. Nicole says something insulting to him. For psychopaths like that, that is enough; he decides to kill her. Real heavy crime is in general nothing like an Agatha Christie novel or a Shakespeare play, it's simple, dull, and ugly. 

2. Imagine a scientist saying: "I have so many observations that I consider the conclusion of my theory to be proved" and you say "What theory?" and he says, "Oh, I haven't worked that out yet, but I'm sure it can be done!" You would call him insane, but that is the reasoning of all the witch-hunters. They have no story, only fragments of conflicting stories that contradict the facts. Thousands of people have tried it but nobody has managed to construct a possible story. I would say it has been proved by now that it can't be done. Simpson had no opportunity; he had an alibi.

   Moreover, it is of course incomprehensible that prosecutor Marcia Clark could have the records of Nicole Browns' last phonecall disappear and not just get them again. The Browns first stated that that phonecall was after eleven; that would have given Simpson a watertight alibi nobody could dispute. They changed their minds and made it a lot earlier. I don't say they were lying, maybe their memory just played a trick on them. They were obviously very much under the influence of the witch-hunters. For a long time Simpson thought they were telling the truth, but when later Doc. Johnson tried to help him prove his innocence and went for those phone records he changed his mind. The Browns refused to sign the request, so the